Seneca Wallace Stars as Two-Face

Seneca Wallace sacks himself.

Seneca Wallace: the garbage man. Photo credit:

Why the hell am I writing about a Cleveland Browns quarterback? Because I hate the NFL’s established metrics system. If you’re not confused, I’ve accidentally let one of my three clones escape and he’s reading this post.

NFL metrics suck. I’m talking about ‘tackles’, ‘yards per attempt’ and my personal favorite: ‘QB rating’. It took a long time for me to understand why. Let’s cast the much-debated Seneca Wallace as our lead villain: Two Face.

On the field, Two Face would show his scarred, deformed side: running out of bounds to escape pressure (resulting in a huge loss of yards, rather than just just throwing the ball incomplete), overthrowing wide open receivers, immediately checking down to running backs three feet away from a charging linebacker, and sacking himself by holding onto the ball for far too long. What was he waiting for? The second coming of Jesus, wearing a Seahawks uniform, to run a slant through the end zone? (I actually first wrote “to run a cross route” and realized the gravity of the mistake). In any case, it was maddening.

Yet, the other side of Batman’s most schizophrenic nemesis, his handsome and unblemished side, was a solid QB rating: 87.0 in 2008 (just above Eli Manning) and 81.9 in 2009. Those are respectable ratings for a guy who quarterbacked a pretty poor offense (that lost a ton of games). So what gives?

I’ll tell you: Seneca Wallace was the garbage time master. He completed passes and often scored when a win was far out of reach, and defenses were simply playing prevent and allowing successful runs or short passes to let the clock expire. Enter: inflated stats. Exit: wins. During competitive game situations he was absolutely disastrous, and was often the reason the Seahawks lost football games.

A pretty handy website exists called They’ve been revolutionizing NFL metrics for years, in an attempt to follow in baseball’s footsteps. Let’s take “Expected Points Added”, a complex measure that compiles positive contributions made by a player, based on important contextual information (like distance, down, score, time remaining, etc). How’d our villain Two Face fare? He recorded an EPA of 16.0 for the 2008 season, just below Tavaris Jackson. Number one on the list that year? Kurt Warner: 176.1.

Periodically, I’ll be looking at Seahawks players or positions to see how they’re really performing, outside of the big plays we all see and fondly remember, or the big mistakes that give us frequent night terrors. First up will be the polarizing Chris Clemons and Red Bryant, Seattle’s starting defensive ends. Before the season began, Pete Carroll got a lot of flak for making these two guys the starters. How have they done in the first four weeks?

Stay tuned to find out.


About Nick

I'm a guy that loves the Seahawks far and away more than any other team in any other sport. I live in Seattle, I'm married to the perfect woman, I work in marketing and I'm nearly into my 30s. Scary. Find me on Twitter talking #seahawks @nandron.
This entry was posted in Seahawks Analysis and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Seneca Wallace Stars as Two-Face

  1. Brian says:

    I always thought that the QB rating stat seemed to misrepresent performance (positively or negatively). Good insight. That EPA seems like it is a bit better. The intangibles as always will always be just that. I have always hated metrics. Specifically centimeters.

    • Nick says:

      It pisses me off when a QB throws a 7 yard pass and the receiver catches and runs for 60 yards and a TD. I’m sorry, that should not count toward QB rating. And I also hate centimeters.

  2. Slobodan Milosevic says:

    The thing that always angers me about QB rating (and the INT stat in general) is when an INT bounces off the hands the WR and should have been caught, but instead bounces up into the air for an easy INT for the team…. now how the hell should that count against the QB?

    • Nick says:

      Yep. That’s only one example. What about a 6 yard pass that the receiver then runs for 50 yards and a TD? The QB should only really be credited for what he was directly responsible: the 6 yard pass completion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s